I'm not sure which freeway exit had entered my head, or whether or not the gallivanting would seemingly bring me to a form of solace, yet I looked forward to foraging through the maladies I would find within the rhetoric.
I heard rumblings in the distance about how liberals are afraid to admit to their heritage, and yet the nonsense thrown out into the Universe by these proud Conservatives were merely vile cat calls mapping the meridians of how liberals hate the rich and want to take their money, like Robin Hood and pass it out to the poor. A few misguided, but seemingly altruistic points of view on their road trips to mediocrity.
I think it is more telling that the Conservatives find it incredulous for the average citizen to view all the money that is spent dishing out nasty conundrums of commentary against their fellow compatriots so they can gain some footholds into the lunatic fringes of their base, as a form of insanity when the middle class that they used to represent is finding it hard defining itself these days.
The idea that people anywhere want something for nothing borders on crossing over the meridians of sanity, when most of the general public that finds itself on the crossroads of fiscal calamity, just want to contribute their skill sets and their work ethics to further the foundations of the communities in which they so frequently find themselves inhabiting. And if these social safety nets that conservatives endear themselves to squawking about, maybe by putting those people receiving such free lunches would just be used to rebuild the infrastructures, teach the children and take care of the senior citizens, then maybe the lights on the main drag could turn from red to green again and these conservative juggernauts can go on perusing their enchanted lifestyles of the rich and famous.
To help out these rascals that don't want to donate some of the riches they have obtained on the backs of the worker bees that so freely gave of themselves to put them in the lifestyles they so generously now preside in, then maybe an alternative to those concepts would be to invest in new technologies that would put them in even more extravagant fiscal menageries . This would not only give them the satisfaction that comes with providing sustenance to those that have their hands out, but add to their coffers of unintended monetary mediocrity.
Somewhere along the highways and byways these outstanding citizens of what is supposedly, according to these philandering representative conservatives, the greatest country in the history of the world have spent their free time taking wrong turns on their excursions by spewing nonsense like the President is Muslim, that he is the most dangerous President we have ever had, and he wasn't even born in this country, so he has no legal or constitutional right to be President. His liberal leanings, though often representing the middle of the road applications in passed legislation by trying to compromise his own prerogatives, to satisfy their wills and whims, gets him peanut gallery salutations of being a fascist, a communist and unpatriotic.
When the concepts came down the road on the Supreme Court's decision on Citizens United, the Jericho walls of Sobriety came tumbling down, blocking the often sane ideals of alternative routes to political, moral and societal destinations of the original road trips mapped out in the Constitution of the United States. Now we find ourselves taking vacations from reality by spending all our values of intellectual property on lobbying and buying instead the influence of those that legislate the boundaries of government.
Sure we need to implement the ideology of less government, but not just the conservative concepts surrounding taxes and regulations that provide some assurance to the communities of humans being, but we must find some other way of defining individual liberties, so conservatives can leave their interventions into our private lives alone. Their financial freedom gives them the ability to stay above the fray, but shouldn't give them the right to take away our personal liberties from afar. They want their guns, but they want to tell us what we should be doing in our own representations of love, in and out of sight, and what we should as individuals, ingest into or how we take care of our own bodies.
As for healthcare mandates, if everyone had to purchase healthcare, then the price would be more reasonable. Instead of putting the emphasis of healthcare on a profit based motif, and having to deal with the costs associated with catastrophic healthcare as opposed to preventative medicine, so we could control the vast majority of the initial costs to the individual consumer. We could also apply varying degrees of healthcare, so as to implement some forms of pier pricing.
Now matter what road trip you deem necessary to follow in the streams of political rhetorical perspective, one thing still stands out as a way to get a grip on meeting some form of political will to balance the budget. Who thought of government workers or politicians having free healthcare plans and government pensions. All politicians and government workers shouldn't have free healthcare and government provided pensions when they either get elected out of office, or choose to retire. They should all have to pay at least a part of their healthcare, like civilian workers do, and they should have to invest in their own pension or retirement plans, just like civilian workers are responsible for. Even more so, those who actually got to take advantage of those situations in the past, should not get Cost of Living Allowances according to the inflation rate at any given time. This is so evident when their is a bad economy and less people working, so as to shrink the prevailing tax base, which by the way is what has happened in Greece, and in other partners involved in the European Union. Thus, for those conservatives, whether they be politicians or not, who don't want us to fall into the welfare state they claim so often the Obama food stamp administration as being a representative of, please accept my apologies when I say, that you are also going to be taken off the welfare roles.
For all of the hot air coming from the right about the complaints of main street of speculation, and trying to come to terms with the environmental impacts the corporate world has deemed itself the right to dictate to the general public, who by the way suffers the most from these tragedies, while these Wiley Coyote bigots live the High Life of the one percent, get a grip. Those people benefiting from the misuse of their responsibilities should stop complaining and start complying to the will of the people, since on a political viewpoint this Democracy is supposedly a representative government of, by and for the people. The corporations should be regulated on that account, and who gave them the right to be king and to dictate, through money, of all things, to not only the government, but also to the individual mandates of constitutional liberties defined by that government decree.
To balance the budget you have to rid yourself of the criminal acts that are continuing by all of the elected official themselves. It is criminal to wage two unfunded wars and an unfunded drug policy for seniors. No more criminal lobbyists creating economic bubbles for the main street alliances called communities to pay for. All elections should be run by the media, giving free television time, which of course could be paid for either by sponsors or by these monstrosities called Political Action Committees. Each person running for office can get up and explain his ideology, his solutions he would apply to the prevailing problems, and then everyone would get a real understanding of who they were voting for. Then, once elected, like a regular job, put in your weekly time, whether it be in a legislation mode, or one that is responsible to those people who voted you into office, by finding out what they want as far as the legislation involved that is being voted on, and then go cast your vote as to the majority of people's choice in the matter. That is what representative Democracy is all about. When you are no longer fulfilling the duties of your job, then away you go by being voted out of office. Is this too difficult to understand and is it too much those concepts of a Utopian Society that we are all due since we pay all these inane taxes, so these political monkeys, corporations, and those who control the wealth of the country can spew out the nonsense we are all jealous, envious or trying to take back what we gave them the chance to achieve. Please explain, in layman's terms and common sense what it is that you think you have a right to bitch about when it is okay to take our country's wealth and ship it overseas, or hide it in untraceable bank accounts offshore.
No comments:
Post a Comment