If one hears someone tell them that pursuit is not the course of action that is recommended, then it is not the right of that individual or open to interpretation the fringe outcomes that are associated with such a decision. Mutual consent is really the authority in such an event, and any opportunity that arises out of a blatant disregard of the instruction has now become the property of the perpetrator. All of the exponential perimeters that occur after this flagrant decision, including carrying an unequal advantage to control the situation, which in reality is not part of the program, in acceptance of the responsibility undertaken are no longer valid as an excuse for your actions and any outcomes are solely the responsibility of the pursuant violator.
Irregardless of the cultural commentary leading up to this event, the decision to no longer comply with the consensual fringes outlined in the original commentary has no bearing as to the calculation of the soon to be applied guilt laid upon said defiant defendant.
So neither close friends or family, with the intent of somehow spinning the responsibilities tied to the original fringe assessment of the given situation, the application of responsibility goes directly onto the person who has gone beyond what little consensual opportunity existed before the perpetration of the prolonged contracted derivitives inherent in having gone beyond the fringe.
Neither the political wills intent on making available some form of character assassination to the victim of this non-consensual inclination to defy the odds to somehow further notions of fearing for one's life can justify any of the actions that eventually occur because of said decision, whether or not they themselves become the victim of the original assault or not. Standing one's ground does not imply the pursuit of any intentional suspicious element in your surrounding environment, but rather a call for sanity, that allowing the proper authority to take over the care and feeding of such fear, so that it would only suffice itself to say, the outcome would at that point in time, be one of a mutual consensual fringe of the variety of more caring conclusions to the problem solving necessary to obtain a more positive outcome to any of the consensual fringe responsibilities we all take on for whatever reason.
No comments:
Post a Comment