It seems as the larger a Beast grows, the harder it is to sustain not only it viability, but it's vascular integrity, as far as maintaining it's own equilibrium. This is the volatile nature of trying to be true to your roots of being what is considered a "passionate conservative".
Now for my own flights of fancy into this predilection into the Beast, I will be symbolizing the Beast to present a political point of view. It is in my own thinking processes, passionate to anyone in particular, to tell them nothing is for free. It is in the best definition of conservatism to try and conserve. I know that is harsh, and very simple in it's architectural literary sense, but it really defines the parameters of it's own existence.
Let me explain some motifs here. First anything that is not supported, in a financial way, since free enterprise and capitalism is based on just that, we must introduce the structural integrity guidelines. To exist one must have the foundations to support any artistic architectural endeavor. In this particular example, money or intellectual property are the foundation to these proposed structures.
So any time you give any part of the structure something for nothing, you disguise the natural inclination for it's own demise. So for example, you cannot, without injecting a fiscal base to anything such as food stamps, welfare and similar coalitions, and expect it to linger in an historical sense, in reality. Either there is money there to continue it's structural integrity in an architectural reality, or there has to be supplemental support in the way of some form of prevailing and legal insurance, both in a monetary or in an intellectual property value.
So the systems we try and stick into the public's view like Social Security, Unemployment Insurance or Disability Insurance are examples of at least the beginnings of showing signs of giving the visual and mental image of having an honest structural integrity flowing in it's veins. Though sometimes without the base support all of these nurturing attempts, to not translate into strong structural support for historical reality to exist on a long term basis. Over the long haul, these temporary structures have to be turned into long lasting building codes.
On the other hand, food stamps, welfare and similar road trips, do not seem to be genuine forms of nomenclatures to produce the foundations necessary for their own sustainability. So it is not real compassionate conservatism to allow those things to continue their misguided tours, and to be considered real destinations or outcomes and should be shut down or discontinued as a way to begin or end a trip.
So don't spend so much time on those few, though misguided in so many ways, trying to find ways to deride the message, but do inject some form of compassionate alternatives to the dialogues. Sure it would be better, for example, for those privileged few, who have put in the work, the time, the energy to become who they are, by following their dreams, not ours, to pay the system that brought them the fortune and satisfaction they have derived from their accomplishments, to reinvest their capital, whether it be in the symbol of money, time or wisdom, to make some of those same possibilities to exist, for those who want to put the effort into those same achievable consequences, to do so. Yet, in so many ways, those opportunities do not become permanent buildings. We then cannot linger when things don't go as planned, but must not forget their is always another form of architecture than can pervade into both the social fabrics and intellectual property values that we can all afford to purchase to gain the foundations of the fiscal landscapes we all desire to dot this wonderful experiment into democracy as a form of free enterprise and capitalism we so fervently and proudly represent as the "United States of America"
Don't stop the possibilities, or alternatives to exist, by attitude or caustic rhetoric. Just allow those situational architectural foundations to enter into the system without pause, and become the compassionate conservative structures we all know to exist in these particular frames of reality we all are co-existing in.
No comments:
Post a Comment